![]() For example, it knows about the Fuji film simulations and you can apply whichever one you want (which I usually don't care about). It knows most, if not all the camera options, so by default it'll produce something which looks more like the camera will make. ![]() It's not doing a generic job, it actually knows what it's doing. What is really useful about Silkypix is it knows about the actual camera and RAW format. ![]() Most of the controls are pretty much the same as any other RAW developer. I don't find it particularly horrible, it's got the most sensible tone curve tool I've found so far. I find Silkypix useful enough that I paid for the pro version. I did a forum search and found lots of hits, but nothing that really answered this for me. If somehow it provides better conversion than what I use now, ON1, I would download it and use it to convert the few photos I want the very best from to TIFFs for further processing in Affinity Photo. I used SilkyPix many years ago with Fuji files, and wow, was it's own beast. ![]() SilkyPix is just generic, and I guess likely was not designed with proprietary info from Panasonic like the Canon-provided converter is for Canon, for instance. I know that the manufacturer raw conversion software that a couple companies provide is claimed by a few people to do better conversion than third-party software, but I really wonder in this case. ![]() Finally made it to the part of my new G9's Advanced Manual (page 300, woohoo!) where it says you can download a free copy of SilkyPix Developer Studio SE8, and am wondering if it is worth the bother? ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |